Participation by our firm’s lawyers and patent attorneys has ensured successful resolution of the following cases of protection of trademark rights in various state agencies and courts including the following:

 

The case of Bulgartabac Holding AD regarding protection of rights to OPAL, Pale Opal, BT, INTER/ИНТЕР, Rodopi/Родопи, Stewardess/Стюардесса, and Tu-134/Ту-134 trademarks in the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation and in Moscow Court of Arbitration;

 

The case of Balkan Pharma Holding AD (Actavis AD) regarding protection of rights to TROXEVASIN (ointment) in the Federal Customs Service of the Russian Federation;

 

The case of Alen Mak AD regarding protection of rights to Pomorin trademark in Rospatent;

 

The case of Alen Mak AD regarding protection of rights to ACHROMIN (makeup preparations) in arbitration courts;

 

The case of Heineken AS regarding protection of rights to KRUŠOVICE trademark in Rospatent;

 

The case of Henkel AG & Co. KGaA regarding protection of rights to SYOSS trademark series in Rospatent;

 

The case of Bayer AG regarding protection of rights to ASPIRIN trademark;

 

The case of Image Holding DP regarding protection of rights to Khortitsya trademark in Rospatent;

 

The case of Image Holding DP regarding protection of rights to Medovukha trademark in the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation.

 

The case of Product Chistaya Liniya LLC regarding protection of rights to Chistaya Liniya trademarks.